Categories
Interview Monthly Screening Series Writing

Interview: Frank Jaffe (Altered Innocence)

Frank Jaffe is the founder of Altered Innocence, the US film distributor specialising in “edgy and artistic foreign, queer, and coming-of-age cinema,” including WW-programmed films Sextool and She Is Conann. Originally from Pennsylvania, Frank moved down to Florida for high school and college, where he studied fashion merchandising (“very Legally Blonde”) and made his first steps into cinema and festival programming. In honour of our screening of She Is Conann, from Altered Innocence favourite Bertrand Mandico, we spoke to Frank, fresh from Cannes, about his path into film distribution, his label’s ethos and a wee bit on our favourite film of 2024, Vera Drew’s The People’s Joker.

[WW] How do you describe Altered Innocence?

[Frank ] My simple explanation these days is it’s kind of a boutique film distribution company specialising in LGBTQ and coming of age cinema. That’s the logline. When I was younger, working at Strand Releasing and I formed this company, it was kind of like a way to put out movies I knew were never going to come out. And also I’m a Blu-Ray nerd, so there were certain movies Strand would pass on and I would watch them and be, like, “Oh, my God, this is so gorgeous. I get why this can’t maybe get a theatrical release, you know, it’s kind of a smaller title, but, oh, my God, this looks so good on my TV, with Blu-Ray.”

So, that’s kind of how it started off. And then kind of filmmakers naturally got in touch with me, like Yony Leyser for Desire Will Set You Free. And then I distributed his documentary Queercore. So, it kind of started off more coming of age, beautiful cinematography like Violet by Bas Devos and Concrete Night by Pirjo Honkasalo, and then it evolved more LGBT because I am queer, so, that was kind of what happened. And essentially the label’s just been movies I like, and usually movies I like are movies other cinephiles like as well. So, I’m usually able to just connect on that level. And I don’t put out movies I don’t like. So, usually there’s a trust that is getting built with people that like the brand. And I think it’s also about just forming a community, finding other like-minded cinephiles and building that cool queer community.

And then, later on, I got into theatrical releasing and the company’s just expanded a lot. But originally it really was just very boutiquey, very, like, me hanging out in the aisles of Blockbuster, looking at all the weird coming of age films from labels like Picture This and TLA and Strand Releasing and things like that. So that’s kind of the aesthetic, you could say – it’s just modernised a little bit.

[WW] Did you find your way to it via your film festival work?

[Frank] It’s actually even simpler than that. We had a cinema on campus. It was about 300 seats, stadium seating, 35mm projection. And we would meet every week to programme it. I started this gay and lesbian film festival while I was there at college. And then one summer I interned at both Strand Releasing and Regent Releasing, which is now closed. That was part of Here TV. So I was very, very interested during college. And then, when I moved out to LA, I somehow got a job at Outfest for a season, for their film festival. And then right after it was over, somehow there was an opening at Strand Releasing, and that’s how I got in. You know, you always joke, with these small little distro companies, you kind of have to kill someone to get in. But it just so happened that one of the employees was leaving and it was just right place, right time.

[WW] Was your role at Strand similar to what you do now?

[Frank] I mean, a little bit. I was more in the home video department, so I was at the base processing orders. We literally had a warehouse attached to the office, and I would send DVDs to Amazon and to all our wholesalers and everything like that. I was also in charge of setting up each home video release, making sure the art… you know, eventually doing the art. I learned on the job how to do DVD and Blu-Ray authoring and helped out a little bit with acquisitions. Ultimately, Marcus and John, who run the company, were the main acquisitions people, but there were certain films I begged them to acquire, one of which was Yann Gonzalez’s first film, You and the Night. I begged them. I was like, “No, we have to do it.” And then, of course, they didn’t even give it a theatrical release. They just put it out on DVD and VOD, which was a little sad. I see where they were coming from a little bit, but I also disagree with it because I would have put that out in cinemas.

[WW] And now you’re in a position to put a film out in cinemas only because it deserves to be?

[Frank] Oh, yeah. Absolutely, I do, and the most difficult thing I am finding these days is that, when I started the company, it was very easy for me to tell sales agents and filmmakers, “I don’t do much theatrical, so this is only home video, but it’ll be a great home video release.” But now, because everyone knows I do theatrical releasing, the hardest thing I found is sometimes I think a title is probably just more suited for home video and I’d probably lose quite a bit of money on the theatrical, but it’s hard for me to tell the filmmaker. I think it has impacted some of my decisions, unfortunately. But I’m trying to get back to that and maybe just be more honest with the filmmakers. And if they hate me, they hate me. But I think I do want more films to get a release. Maybe I do have to be more honest. I don’t know!

[WW] How self-conscious is your curation now? Like, is there a distinction between “an Altered Innocence film” and a “Frank” film?

[Frank] It’s all Frank, Altered Innocence, it’s both, intermingled. It is me, so… I mean, there’s a couple films I’ve picked up where I’m just like, “Oh, I might not love it, but it does fit the brand. I think enough people will like it.” I have done that a few times. There’s certain films where, if I watched it at home, I’d probably be like, “Eh, three stars. I won’t watch it again.” You know, “Three out of five, it was fine. Whatever.” But because it does fit the mold a little bit more and could help the bottom line, help me release other cooler films, yeah, I’ve picked them up and I’ve put them out and, uh… They’re not bad films, but, yes, I have done that a little bit.

[WW] Have you got to the point of anyone pulling your sleeve with films you have to put out, as you did at Strand?

[Frank] Yeah, I get recommendations all the time, and some of them are really good recommendations. I mean, 100%, absolutely. I’ve even gotten pitches from filmmakers, randomly. That’s how I got A Dim Valley. That was a film I loved and I hadn’t heard of it. And the filmmaker emailed me, Brandon Colvin, who’s the biggest sweetheart ever. He just pitched it to me, I watched it, and I was just like, “Damn, this movie is so good.” And that’s happened. So I’ve gotten a filmmaker pitch and that was great.Yony Leyser was the same way. I’ve gotten tons of recommendations from other people, and that’s kind of motivated me to look for, like… Or it’s a film I’d seen a long time ago and then somebody who reminds me about it, and that motivates me to be like, “Okay, let me look for the rights. Let me see if it is available.” And of course, sales agents, when I go to these big film festivals, they’ll pitch me a title that I wouldn’t normally, like be like, “Oh, 100%, I’m going to watch that.” And then they convince me and then I watch, and I’m like, “Oh, no, they’re right,” you know, “that was that was pretty good.”

[WW] What is your process for sourcing / selecting titles for distribution? How much it is based on festival research, say, versus screeners you’ve been sent, existing relationships, independent research and/or films you’ve always loved and had in your pocket, so to speak?

[Frank] I think literally it’s kind of 25% across everything you’ve mentioned. Like 25%, it’s filmmakers I’m tracking, 25%, it’s sales agent pitches, 25%, it’s old films that I’m just like, literally, I’ve seen this film. I love it. So now I’m researching who the heck has it, where can I find it? And then the other 25% was sales agent pitches. When I go to these big film festivals, they send me the emails, like, “Here’s our slate.” And I’ll look for the gay titles or the, you know, cool, like… I always love seeing a still image that actually has like good cinematography. I’m like, “Okay, that’s that’s interesting to me.” And unique sounding scripts. I’m definitely more of a script guy – script and cinematography – than anything else.

And then, with Bertrand, because I’ve been following him for a while, I’m just constantly salivating for whatever he’s putting out next. I mean, he’s just one of the coolest guys working in cinema today. And so whenever he has another film, I’m extremely excited. Like, even for this one, the premiere was somewhere I couldn’t go. I knew the sales agent pretty well, I’d worked with him a few times and he’s the kind of sales agent that really wants you to see the film on the biggest screen possible. He doesn’t really want you to watch it on a screener. So for this one, She Is Conann, it was crazy, we actually organized like a private screening in LA, just for me. It was, like, insane. I probably can’t mention the cinema that did it for us, because they basically let me do it for free, which was so cool as well. We’ve got a great cinema culture in LA and there’s a lot of great theaters here that know that I’m doing small films and definitely sympathize with that. And so they just let me watch it at like noon on a Tuesday in their theatre. It was so cool.

[WW] What’s the most fun part for you? Is it hunting for rights?

[Frank] Hunting for the rights is pretty fun. I like meeting all these new people and finding avenues for collaboration. I think I just enjoy getting everything put together – you know, finding the perfect artist to work on the front cover art, and I always love the process of of massaging the trailer because I love trailers. I love coming up with a really sexy trailer. There are certain trailers where I’ll commission them and I’ll just know, at the end of the process, I’ll be like, “Wow, this is a trailer I’m probably going to watch like 200 times in my life, and I really enjoy it.” The best recent example’s probably The Wounded Man trailer. That’s a trailer I watch a lot. It’s a great one. But I have a lot of other good trailers. Concrete Night, Violet. I have this one trailer editor, I went to school with him, and he always creates great trailers for us. I don’t know, I kind of love the act of finally getting the Blu-Ray authored and then popping it into my player and watching it. That’s always really cool. It just looks so good. The final package. I like just seeing it all finally be, like, “Okay, it’s on my TV, it’s real.” And imagining other people doing the same thing, which is always really cool. That was such a big part of my childhood, DVDs and Blu-Rays, so it’s always cool to have that feeling of contributing to that culture.

[WW] Do you enjoy the sense of curating someone’s evening?

[Frank] No, I actually have a disconnect with how people run their lives, to be honest. So that that is not the exciting part for me. Literally, I’m so disconnected. I’m in my own little cocoon world, so picturing that, that doesn’t excite me, but I guess I just get excited by the idea of people enjoying cinema and, especially on Blu-Ray, enjoying really high quality. Basically, like, being in a cinema, is the quality. Not to brag, but I’m a really good video encoder and I actually pay a lot of attention to… I’ve kind of got one of those eyes that if there is compression artifacts, it bothers me. Low video quality really bothers me. That’s why I’m always shocked that people still can watch DVDs. You know, maybe I should wish for that eye, the eye that ignores all the issues. Some people live their lives blissfully ignorant of compression artifacts and things like that. Like, whenever a scene goes to dark and there’s all these blocky… I’m, like, dying. Like, I feel like it’s bullets riddling my body. And there’s a lot of Blu-Rays out there that are really badly encoded. I don’t want to name names, but a lot of people who put out movies, they kind of just hire a random Blu-Ray authoring place and they just do a really bad job. And it just, urgh, it bugs me.

[WW] Some people don’t even register wrong aspect ratios, when characters’ faces are not human shapes…

[Frank] I had that with Wild Reeds. That was a victory for me. André Téchiné’s Wild Reeds, I put that out from StudioCanal. I always notice that – because the HD master had leaked a long time ago, somebody had put it out in France. I looked at it, and I was, like, “That doesn’t look right. That aspect ratio…” The faces were, like, squashed. They were like a little pencil-y. And so when I picked up the rights to it, convincing them so hard. I was like, “Can you please look at it?” And they were like, “The aspect ratio is correct.” I’m like, “Yeah, the bars are correct, but that doesn’t mean the aspect ratio’s correct.” They’re like, “Fine, we’ll go and we’ll look at a release print,” but they hated me. Then they got back to me a week later and were like, “You are correct, it is wrong. We are redoing it now.” And I was like, “Yes! I knew it!”

[WW] How do you judge success otherwise? Is it peer approval, sales…?

[Frank] Sales are great [for judging success]. A good example of sales making me excited and feeling like what I’m doing is good is my release of Equation to an Unknown, which me and Yann Gonzalez worked on very closely together. And, you know, we can’t quite figure out what it is – besides the fact the movie is very good – but sales of that one, it’s one of my top-selling titles, and it’s just so weird, because it’s this sadboi gay porn arthouse film, and it just keeps selling and we’re very, very, very thrilled about it. We think it might just be a good word of mouth title. We even got Slant to review it and they gave it a positive review. So maybe it’s just like a kind of wild card, kind of “it’s a porno film, but it’s arthouse. It’s arthouse porn!” And there’s very few of those, to be quite honest. But compare that to the Halsted set, which has only sold okay, I would say, and the Bressan Jr films, which has also just sold okay. And I’m like, “Well, Equation to an Unknown sold so well, why can’t the others?” So, trying to recreate that magic is sometimes difficult. But, yes, very satisfying to know that certain titles that you’re, like, “Well, that’s just something fun we’re doing and we know we’re probably not going to make that much on it, but whatever,” and then all of a sudden it does great, and you’re just like “Amazing, fabulous,” you know? And then we screened it at the New Beverly, you know, which was crazy, and we had a sold out crowd for that. It’s been a blast. 

[WW] Distributors don’t always make it easy to book their films, particuarly in Europe, but you seem to make a point of it.

[Frank] Yes. Well, it comes from booking films, because when I did the film festival in college, I was doing the direct booking for that, and sometimes it was a little silly. Like, there was a short film fee and it was, like, $200 from a European distributor. I remember one time, luckily the college paid for it, but I remember for Norway, we were trying to get a film from there, and they were charging us, like, $1,000. It was also a wake up call just talking to these small town, small LGBT organizations and they just want to screen a film for 30 people, you know? And I’m going to try to let them. Obviously, I still need to make a little bit of money on it, but try to do that in the easiest way possible, because I want the films to get out there. And if you’re trying to start a small, little micro cinema, charging $5 tickets or $7 tickets, then I want you to grow that. I don’t want to stop you from growing. The more they succeed, the more I succeed. So that’s where it goes. And they’re small films. I don’t have this weird personality that it’s, like, “Oh, these are huge films! If you want them, you got to pay for them!” You know, they’re small. 

[WW] Sometimes their rationale is because the film’s so small, that’s why they need to charge so much, because it’s their only chance to make money.

[Frank] Yeah. That’s not really my business model. I somewhat see where they’re going with that, but I think you can only charge that if it’s something so specialized that you just know people will pay for it, because “it never happens” or blah, blah, blah. I remember one of the hardest films I had to distribute, a few years ago, was Stop-Zemlia, which was a Ukrainian film. And of course, I distributed it right before the Ukrainian war started. So when the war started, I was getting so many requests to donate the film. And I had to balance that. I did, like, half donations, half, “Come on, just give me a little something,” like, “I don’t want to be a war profiteer here, but at the same time, I can’t give all the screenings away for free.” So that was a tough one to distribute and I still have not made money. That’s a film I’m very much in the hole on, unfortunately. Great film! I knew it when I picked it up that it probably was never going to make money, and it didn’t.

[WW] Is there something you wish people understood better about what you do?

[Frank] No. I’m fine. As long as people keep watching the films, I’m very happy. One of the fun things about this company is I don’t want to be an A24 or Neon. I want to stay small. I don’t like dealing with… How to say it? I guess I was just imagining A24 having, like, 500 employees. I’m like, “I don’t want 500 employees. I don’t want to deal with those lawyers and things like that.” You know, The People’s Joker was… I’ve had enough time with lawyers in the past year where I really, don’t want to do that anymore. 

[WW] On The People’s Joker, when did you first realise it was something you wanted to release? Did you see it at Toronto?

[Frank] No, I remember I heard about it a little bit at Toronto, because one of the stars of the film is actually someone I worked with for years at Strand Releasing, Nathan Faustyn. So it was crazy, because I heard he was in this film, and then I heard it got pulled. When I was hearing about it, I didn’t dismiss it, I just remember thinking, “Oh, that sounds really cool. I’m sure some big distributor will do it. I’m not going to even think about it.” And then it literally disappeared from my mind. And then Outfest said they were going to play it. And that was kind of the comeback tour, Outfest, technically the US premiere. I got a ticket to it and I just watched it. And as I was watching it, I was just, like, “Oh, damn, this movie’s really good.” It felt dangerous and underground, and it felt like a movie that not every person would get, but the right people would get 100% – 110%. I’d heard that maybe there was a distributor, but then Vera, at the screening, was like, “We don’t have a distributor.” And then I was like, “Okay, I need to try.” And then me and Vera met up and we have very, very similar taste in movies and culture and, you know, anarchist ideas. And so it was pretty much, you know, a match made in purgatory. I don’t wanna say heaven. Movie heaven. And then we decided to work together.

And, you know, I was a little afraid, but not that afraid. When I was watching in the cinema, I was just, like, “Oh, my God, this is such a parody.” Like, “I don’t know [yet] if technically, 100%, legally, it is a parody, but for all intents and purposes, the filmmaker just, you know, made a parody film. So, I don’t see why this is an issue.” And, yeah, we just started working on it and it’s had its ups, it’s had its downs. But right now, we’re just so thrilled with the response. I’m usually not trawling Letterboxd every day. But during the theatrical release, I was trawling Letterboxd every day. Just every day, just quickly checking, like, “Was I right? Okay, I was right.” Then the next day, “Was I right? Okay. Yes, I’m still right.” Because I was just always worried that, somehow… Because we did a tiered release where we started one week only in New York, then we went to eight other major cities, and then we went to, like, 30 and then we went to, like, 80. So every time a new week came, I was just, “Oh, the smaller cities, they’re not going to get it.” Or, “Somehow, the DC heads are going to hear about it. They’re all going to go to the theater this week and hate it,” or something like that. But it never happened. Every week, we just constantly get positive reviews. And if people hate it, they’re shutting their mouths about it, which is what Vera always says at all the movie screenings. Like, “If you love it, tell all your friends. If you hate it, just don’t say anything.” We’re still trying to figure out international distribution. Obviously, we want everyone to see it, so it’s still a bit of a journey to go. It’s definitely not over, but it’s been really fun.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Weird Weekend presented She Is Conann on Friday 31st April, 2024, part of our monthly screening series at OFFLINE, Glasgow.

Find out more about Altered Innocence’s latest theatrical and disc releases here. Follow them on Instagram here.

Categories
Interview Monthly Screening Series News Writing

Interview: Adam Torel (Third Window Films)

Adam Torel is the founder and one-man-band leader of Third Window Films, established in 2005 with the express intention of broadening the canon / taste / market for Asian cinema in the UK, beyond the J-Horror boom of the late ’90s and early noughts. When we were trying to source a screening licence for Sogo Ishii’s The Crazy Family for WWI, back in 2018, Adam was one of the first trees we shook for a lead. Now, the film is finally getting a UK disc release, part of Third Window’s Director’s Company series, and we jumped at the chance to screen it again, in a brand-new restoration, for its 40th anniversary. We spoke to Adam about the origins of Third Window and the work behind a release like The Crazy Family.

We started discussing last month’s screening, Kim’s Video, and how regional institutions, like the Florida video store where Adam cut his teeth, are comparatively unsung and undervalued. Adam had seen Kim’s Video while sitting on a film festival jury.

[WW] One of the through-lines for our monthly series is curation and the people who build collections and shape other people’s collections – arbiters of taste, I suppose, would be one way of saying it. Really, it’s about way-finders, as opposed to gatekeepers, and curating the canon in that sense.

[Adam] When I worked at the video shop, I was like that. I was really into independent films, and I lived in a small town in Florida. There was nothing there, but there was this amazing video shop that I ended up working at. I was always into film, but it was there I got into, you know, hardcore, like, super-rare films. And that video shop, the owners just basically bought every single VHS that was ever released, whether they liked it or not. They just thought, “We need to buy everything and keep it in the shop,” you know, to keep these films alive. And they never threw anything away. So, as films would lose their licenses or they would become out of print, copies still existed in this shop.

The owner of the shop made his money through real-estate, but his passion was cinema, this tiny shop in Florida that nobody ever really came to, but you’d have, like, 50,000 films. They’d been buying VHS since the format started, so there were all these films that you could never find anywhere, ever. And this was obviously before the internet as well, so if you wanted to find out about something, you would go to the shop, and these two – this owner and this manager – they basically had an encyclopedic memory in their brain. You’d come in, or a customer would come in, “Yeah, I remember this movie when I was, like, 15 and, like, this cat died,” and they’d just, boom, they’d know exactly what it was, who directed it, who the cameraman was. It was an unbelievable experience. Actually, I wasn’t old enough to work there, but I managed to convince them to let me work there when I was 16. And I worked there for four years, just watching movies in the shop, day and night, and then taking stuff home and watching it till the morning. I couldn’t sleep very well at the time, so I’d be watching all day and night.

I got into Asian cinema because it was the films that you couldn’t see, even though they had everything. I was always trying to find the films that were just impossible to find. At the time, [Asian films were] really hard to see overseas, so I was, like, “All right, I’m going to get into Asian films and do all these trades with Video Search of Miami and all these places.” They’d send you a catalogue of handwritten titles, in the post, and you’d get it, and you wouldn’t even know what any of them was, because it’s not like you could look on the internet and say, “What’s this Centipede Horror?” You’re just like, “Oh, Centipede Horror, that sounds all right.” And then you would either trade them with what you had or you’d post the money in the post, and then, months later, this VHS would arrive. And I would just do that and then copy them and bring them in the store myself to rent out to people.

So, obviously it was a bit dodgy in that respect, but, you know, that was the only way that you could see these films. And also, this was in the ’90s, and Tartan Films in England were becoming this big thing for Asian films. So, me being in America and buying a lot of those Tartan DVDs and VHS from the UK, I’m English, so I thought, “I’m going to go back to England and see if I can get a job at Tartan Films.” And I went back, and I got a job interning there at first, and then became an employee, and that, I guess, started the concept of me working within the world of distribution, not just, like, being interested in it.

[WW] So, what was the step to you setting up Third Window?

[Adam] When I got into Tartan Films, I guess it was around the time that everyone fell in love with them. They were releasing all these bangers every month, and it was a sort of golden age for them. Not just Asian cinema, but for all sorts of films. And then, as the DVD market started to peak, and as J-Horror started to fizzle out, I was there telling them, “Stop just putting all these shit, long-haired ghost films. If you’re gonna buy J-Horror, or, like, genre films, there are all these films from Asia.” But, you know, the thing about a company like that is your image, as a consumer, is, “Wow, they’re this amazing company and everybody must love cinema a lot.” When you end up working there, nobody knows anything about cinema, except for the interns, you know, or, like, the really low people. So, you get a bit disillusioned, and you’re like, “Well, there are all these great films, but they’re just a business,” you know? “They’re just thinking about what to make money with.” So, I started saying, “All right, I’m going to get these films that I think are good for you.” Actually, I initially went to the boss, Hamish McAlpine, with titles, saying, “Look, I’ll buy these films for you and you can release them, because it will make the company better and you won’t have any risk on the money for them.” I went and bought these films, and then, when I told him that, he fired me immediately. In my mind, it was a good thing. But he was, like, “You’re a traitor to the company, and you’ve gone behind my back.”

When I started Third Window Films, my whole point was being a company that anybody could just mail and I’d reply back to them. Because any company or any person that owns a relatively large company, even if they’re distributing minor cult films, he has no connection at all to the consumers. So, he doesn’t care, he’s just living in Soho with, like, a Lamborghini and asking people from the office to sit outside for his car so he doesn’t get a ticket. That’s basically the way that he ran things. And I was really sort of against that. But I thought, you know, “Wouldn’t it be great if I pay for them, and therefore there’s no risk on you?” But, for him, it’s all about money, it’s he that decides everything, and if you go against him, you’re… So, he immediately fired me, the moment I said that, and then I thought, “Well, I better just start it myself.”

[WW] And you make a point of being more collaborative, more kind of collegial, of having good relationships with other people in the industry.

[Adam] It’s really important for me. I mean, I don’t have the name brand or the money or the status to do what I want, like Hamish McAlpine, so I need to be on good terms with everybody. There’s loads of times when I work for, like, months for free, just to help out, even other distributors, where even it could be a loss to my own releases. For example, with films like Crazy Family, the rights are so complicated that I need to basically work as a sales agent on behalf of the Japanese, for free. So, no commission. But what I do is, in order to clear the rights, I need to go to the producers or the rights-holders and go with, like, this much money from all these distributors. Then I can go to them and say, “Look, I have $30,000,” or something like that, “we can do a deal like that.” I work as a producer as well and you always have to think of how everybody would think of an outcome.

So, what I do is, including films like Crazy Family, or any of these other titles that I do, I find distributors overseas, like Error 4444, who are also handling Crazy Family, which I’ve also sold to France and Germany and all these other countries, and then take all their money, together with mine, and go to the rights-holders. But at the same time, that loses sales for me. Even if the region codes may be different, I can still get some sales to America, but now I won’t be able to. And it’s not like I’m getting the film for free myself in exchange, nor am I getting a commission for their sale. And in order, also, to make their release easier, I need to make loads of bonus pictures, subtitling, do all these things for free and then give it to them to make their release easier. It causes a lot of time and stress, and I get nothing out of it. But if I don’t do these things, the films don’t get released at all because the Japanese, like, with Crazy Family and Mermaid Legend, all these films haven’t been released in 40 years because it’s too hard to work with the Japanese rights-holders, especially if the rights are a mess, and also in terms of restorations as well. You can’t just say, “Well, I’ll pay you for the license fee,” then use that to make the restoration. The companies are going to say, “No, you have to pay us the money for restoring and pay us a license fee on top of it,” which is impossible. So, that’s why I do all these things and get all this money from here and there. Like financing a film, like producing a film, it’s imperative to do these things, just for the sake of these films.

[WW] We have a very limited experience of the same process, with some non-English language films. The energy, psychic energy, expense – it can be a wild amount of investment and time.

[Adam] Working with Japanese is not easy at the best of times. Luckily, I do speak Japanese and I live here, so that does move things forward. But there is a reason why Japanese films just don’t get released overseas. I’ve lived here for long enough, I understand how they work, but that also means that I need to switch my mind to…a Japanese mode when I deal with them. But then also, like, the Western mode when I deal with the Westerners and the Western companies and back and forth. And especially for contracts as well, I need to make the contracts in certain ways, and I have to translate it to Japanese. With these, like, ’80s films, especially the Director’s Company, because it’s from a company that went bankrupt, it’s especially complicated. I’ve been working on these for a long time and, in the end, because I’m selling it to all these other distributors in order to get the ball rolling, not only will I lose out on the financial aspect of it, but there’s nothing exclusive about it. When I did Door recently, which was a huge amount of work, and then I sold it to an American company called Terror Vision, and everybody’s like, “Wow, Terror Vision rescued this film Door.”

I’ve only recently started to realise that I should put my logo on the front of the data before I send it [to partners], so that at least, when they put their release out, it says “Third Window Films” on the front. I guess I’m not very good at promoting myself or my company, even, which is just me anyway. But I do realise, for example, there are many film producers that you look on IMDb and they’ve got these lovely profile photos of themselves, and you actually look into it and they’ve done nothing whatsoever. There are other people that do all the hard work and don’t get the credit. But do you really want to put the energy into promoting yourself, or is it the promoting the product? It depends on the person, I guess.

[WW] How do you gauge success, for yourself and for Third Window?

[Adam] Just the sales units. I mean, I also work as a sales agent, for titles like Beyond the Infinite Two Minutes and River and all that, where I take the film from the beginning and I bring it to festivals, I create a buzz, I do PR, and then I sell it, the rights only, as a job, so I get a commission for that. And in that case, if I sell the remake rights, which I’ve done for a few films, I get money, so that’s fine for me. It helps me buying, like, these tiny, obscure films, but, otherwise, yeah, I guess it’s sales. But it gets hard, because sales just aren’t that good. I would have never done this in the past, but maybe I need to release a film like One Percenter or something, like, a genre film, because maybe that will sell more to people that haven’t heard of Third Window Films, and that might get them into watching the films, which are completely different films anyway. But I’m just trying to try different things, because it’s a lot harder nowadays. I see companies like Radiance, who are doing massive amounts of sales, but they’re a lot more structured, and they’re also not handling just Asian films. When you’re dealing with niche Asian, or especially Japanese-only films, it’s just too niche, I guess, even if you do try to release, like, an action film like One Percenter every so often. It’s tough. I never wanted to distribute a film that has already been distributed, or has a chance of being distributed. You know, my mindset was always, like, if somebody’s going to distribute this film, then there’s no reason for me to distribute the film.

[WW] How do you practically approach something like The Crazy Family, then, that’s arguably even more niche than the earlier Ishii films?

[Adam] Yeah, more obviously genre films have been distributed. I mean, Crazy Thunder Road was a real pain because the music rights had never cleared for overseas use and we had to clear them, but I think Burst City is quite well-known enough that releasing Crazy Thunder Road off that, because it’s a better version of Burst City, made it a little more accessible, ’cause it’s a sort of rock-and roll-punk film. But Crazy Family, even though it’s not really been seen, it’s a film that everybody sort of knows of, like Typhoon Club. Everybody thinks it’s amazing, but it’s just not available. But I’d always wanted to release Crazy Family because it’s my favourite of his, or one of them. I mean, he’s got so many great films that are so different. Years ago, I was looking out for the rights and I ended up at Toho because WField and Toho owned the rights, and neither can move without the other. And Toho were just impossible to work with. If you asked to do a one-off screening, even if it’s a ten-seat cinema, it’s, like, $1,500 minimum. But they don’t care, because they own Godzilla and they’re making so much money.

When I came to Japan, I started learning a little more about the culture here, and also working with Korea before and working with Hong Kong, the reason why they do these things is because even big companies like Toho or Toei, the international divisions are so small. We’re talking a couple of people. Toho, a little more, but Toei’s, like, two people. It’s not worth it for them to draw up a contract and do all this stuff for one screening, unless it’s $1,500. So, those companies, they all have a rule where it’s just, “We’re just not going to sell it.” A film festival can’t play it, or we’re not going to sell the rights to it, unless it’s… For Toho, they won’t sell any film for under $10,000. Any film. Doesn’t matter if it’s, like, a film that no-one’s ever heard of, that’s never been released. They just don’t care. It’s a mix of them not caring and also that they’re just too busy. Japan, it’s all based on the domestic market, because all the money is made domestically. It’s like India, the reason why Indian films aren’t released properly overseas is because everyone who works in the Indian film industry works on the domestic side of it. So, conversely, the reason why Korea is such a big thing and Korean films are such a big thing is because they have had K-pop and everything to expand around the globe and therefore each company has a massive section for International. And they all speak English really well and know exactly what the international market is like, so they know what prices they can sell it at and how to deal with distributors, and all these things which the Japanese just don’t know. For example, Kadokawa is a massive company, they’ve been around for 100 years, they have all these films, and they have one person who handles international film festivals, she doesn’t fucking understand a word of English. Her job is working with international film festivals, she can’t fucking speak English! It’s unbelievable, when you think about it, but, like, that’s just Japan.

Before I came here, when I was working as a festival or buyer or anything, I was like, “What are you asking me, $2,000 for a fucking film screening?!” Even if we had an 800-seat cinema, it’s not going to make the money back for us. Like, it’s crazy. And then I came here, and I realised, like, “Ah, that’s the reason why.” I still think they’re ruining Japanese film culture because, by not doing the deals, no films are being released, and then when you have a new film that you want to go overseas, people are going to be so far away from Japanese film culture that they’re not going to be interested in buying your new film. Also, working as a producer here and distributor also here as well, I realised it’s just such a small amount of money, compared to the amount of money we’re going to make in Japan, that, like, is it even worth it? You have to put so much energy in for such a small return. I mean, you have to really think of the big picture, so that’s why, I guess, you have all these issues with so many of these films, especially the older ones, because there are less and less people alive who are even connected or remember them.

So, a friend of mine, a few years ago, found all these negatives for Director’s Company, including Door and Typhoon Club and Crazy Family, all these films. Obviously, I loved Crazy Family, but him finding the negatives started the process, this rights clearance issue and these re-scanning of films. And because I started releasing all these Director’s Company films – first of all with Door and Typhoon Club and Guard from Underground – I thought, “Well, Ishii Sogo was part of the Director’s Company,” and Crazy Family was his only film for them, except for Half Human, which is a short film, “that needs to be a part of this series, because it’s a seminal film of the Director’s Company.” The thing about Ishii Sogo, he’s a director. There are some directors who also understand the other aspects of the industry, like Tsukamoto Shinya, who understand about distribution, understand about rights, ownership. But Ishii Sogo, he goes to anybody, “I’m just desperate to make this film.” Like, “Just make it happen.” And he goes on to the next project. So, he doesn’t understand about the rights to the film, who owns it. So, his films just get lost, in that respect. And he’s always onto the next film, so he doesn’t really, I guess, care so much about finding out about what happened to the last ones. I wanted to release some of his other films, like Angel Dust and Labyrinth of Dreams, but that would be just more hectic. Considering I’m already focused on the Director’s Company series at the moment, I might as well just put all my attention on The Crazy Family. There are more obscure titles from the Director’s Company that become a little more sellable, once people are buying into that label, that sub-label, and therefore, it keeps it going a little more. It was only around for ten years, and most of the films from the company aren’t very good and so it’ll probably fade out by the end of year, I’d imagine, and I’ll have to move on to the next thing.

Japanese poster for The Crazy Family, featuring chaotic cartoon image of the titular family, framed with sections of Japanese.
Theatrical poster for The Crazy Family (illustration by Teruhiko Yumura)

[WW] And so, you always have your eye on the next thing, you must have stuff percolating. Or do you have to kind of keep your entire focus on the current thing?

[Adam] I need to plan at least a little bit ahead, but a lot of the time things just fall out of the sky. This Director’s Company series was just a situation where I ran into somebody, they had these negatives and, okay, let’s move on with that. But I don’t even know what I’m going to release next year. I know what I’m releasing this year, in terms of other titles, but next year I have nothing. So, I need to hope that new films get made, or things fall into place.

[WW] When you have the film and you know you’re going to release it, I understand that you do the subtitles yourself. Does that mean translation or preparing the materials, or both of those things?

[Adam] For the feature subtitles, usually I don’t, because they’re usually ready. You know, I think most Japanese films, even if they’re old, they usually have feature subtitles because they’ve played at a film festival in the past. There have been some films where I’ve just re-subtitled the film myself. Like Door and Door II, I just did them myself, because in those cases, I was also working with the sale agent for them, so I needed to have subtitles to show them to film festivals. So, in those cases, I will do the subtitles, but it’s mostly for the bonus features.

Obviously, I need to save as many costs as I can, so usually I do all the subtitling for the bonus features, like audio commentaries, making-of’s, interviews – anything like that, I’ll do that. For the translations, usually [I work] with a few different people. I have a Japanese friend that speaks English, who lives in England, to do some work, to read through, and then I’ll read through and I’ll send it out to a few people, and we’ll just fix it up, in that respect.

For the extras, first of all, when I came into the industry 20 years ago, and it was like you could sell a DVD with burned-in subtitles and, like, no extras and, like, you’d sell it for 20 quid and it would totally be fine. Now, everybody wants fucking all these extras and, like, stupid packaging and all that. And as somebody not from that generation… I don’t even have a television, I don’t care about 4K or anything like that. For me, it was just more important that I was seeing the film, and nowadays, that just doesn’t work. But, then again, nobody watches the extras, but you’ve got to have them on there.

Sometimes, I try to find people on YouTube that have made, like, good video essays and just ask them, “Do you want to do one for me?” I think the problem is sometimes you end up just going back to the same old people. But then, I think, as a consumer, every time you look and it’s another commentary by this person or it’s another one by that person, it gets a bit stale. The design, as well, for posters, you don’t really want to ask the same designer every time, but you find somebody who’s easy to go with and it just becomes a sort of go-to. It’s just, I guess, ease of a rhythm, I guess, than trying to find out new people and hoping that they turn out well or not. Because you could go and make the effort to find these people that sound like they could do a good job, and then you get the product, you’re like, “What the fuck is this?”

Black and white still image of older man wearing a safety helmet attacking a younger man with a pick axe. The younger man wears a transparent pyramid on his head, and defends with a baseball bat.
The Crazy Family (逆噴射家族, Sogo Ishii, 1984)

[WW] How do you feel about piracy? Are there degrees of it that you’re comfortable with?

[Adam] Yeah, I mean, it’s a double-edged sword, because I understand why somebody would want to help enrich others with a film that is not available anywhere, and therefore they put it on the internet. Of course, at the same time I’d be like, “Well, I’m just not going to release that film now,” because it’s available too easily on the internet. But then again, I might think, “Well, the moment I release my copy, it’s immediately going to be put on the internet anyway.” Which is a reason why a lot of Japanese companies don’t want to sell the films for small amount, because they sell somebody the rights for, like, $3,000, and then the person who puts it out makes it available to be pirated when it’s a film that has never been pirated before and therefore it’s going to kill their sales.

When I bought a film recently from another company, I put it out, and then it got put on the internet, and they were, like, “Now we’ve lost the US sale for it,” because now it’s just too easily available everywhere, and what can I do? But I understand that that makes them think, “Well, we’re just not going to want to sell it for anything less than an amount that makes it worth it being now available to anybody online.” So, it’s complicated. But I think people who are going to download it are going to download it whether or not there’s a copy to buy anywhere.

I think there’s so many people nowadays that they’re just used to it. It’s unbelievable sometimes. I’ll post up something on the Third Window Films’ Facebook, and the moment I put it up, they’re like, “Can somebody send me a download link?” I’m like, “What the fuck?” But that’s just the mindset of people now, especially people that are from an era that films are so readily available, internet is so fast that that’s how they think. Maybe they don’t think it’s a bad thing and you can’t tell somebody with that mindset, “No, you should be paying for this.” And the world has changed with Netflix, because somebody could pay £10 a month and have access to thousands of films. And it’s like, “Why should I rent this one film digitally for, like, £3? I can pay £10, £5 a month and get MUBI with 1,000 films,” or, “£5 is close to zero, I’ll just download it”, you know? There’s no gap any more, in that respect. And, in that case, what am I to say? That’s just the world we live in. That’s why we have to make these collectors editions, because it has to be worth something that people want to have in their home, that they’ll pay the amount for. Otherwise, if it was just a disc with no bonus features on it, people will just download it anyway.

One of the reasons I moved to Japan – I enjoy living in Japan so much – is that I was getting a bit tired of distribution in the UK, because of piracy and such. Japan has no piracy, no piracy whatsoever, because the police cracked down on it, big-time. The whole market is completely different. Video-on-demand is really not a big thing here, despite the fact we have such great internet. It’s like going back in time, you know? The UK market, it’s all day-and-date, you release it in cinemas and you’re on digital, and it’s all the same day. Back in the days of distribution, before Netflix, you always had the holdbacks, and you’d have a VHS rental. Before sell-through, you’d have a copy just for rental shops. The world has changed so much, and with that, film distribution. But Japan is like an outlier because most films only get a theatrical release here and don’t get a video release or VOD release. Recently, VOD has become a little more, but there’s no sell-through on a lot of titles, a lot of it’s just rental. You still have video rental shops as, like, a normal thing. And people still go to the cinema, and there’s still a hold-back of, like, six months or so between the theatrical and the video.

UK theatrical poster for One Cut of the Dead, a composite image of various stills from the film

The cinema experience is quite different here because a film can only be seen in the cinemas, and therefore, you know, you have to go to the cinema to watch it. And it also allows for the film industry and for independent cinemas to continue going, where you can see so many independent films in cinemas. I think one of the reasons I stopped theatrical distribution in the UK was cinemas would take a film of mine, not put any of the posters up, not promote it at all, and then, like, give it a fucking 11am slot, and then nobody would come on the first day and they would just cancel it. And, it’s like, well, what about word of mouth, you know? There are so many films, if it wasn’t for word of mouth, the film would have died. And in Japan, you can have a film made for, like, $5,000 by a student get a three-week run. Boom. No problem. Every day. And that allows for word of mouth and for things like One Cut of the Dead to become huge successes. And the cinema will do so much effort to promote your film. That really made me fall in love with distribution again, because they’re keeping it like the old style.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Weird Weekend present The Crazy Family on Friday 26th April, 2024, part of our monthly screening series at OFFLINE, Glasgow. Tickets are available here.

Third Window’s restoration of The Crazy Family is released on Blu-ray on 17th June, 2024, as part of their Director’s Company series, details here.